PANEL DECISION The League App Inc v Domain Protection Services Inc / Linda Xu Case No D2018-0075 1 The Parties The Complainant is The League App Inc of San Francisco California United States of America �United States � represented by IPLA United

alan adlarının FPS Inc aracılığı ile tescil edildiğini ve bu adlarının halihazırda Davalı nın adına kayıtlı olduğunu Ulusal Tahkim Forumu na gönderdiği e-posta ile teyit etmiştir FPS Inc Davalı nın FPS Inc kayıt

PANEL DECISION The League App Inc v Wan Tu Case No D2018-0079 1 The Parties The Complainant is The League App Inc of San Francisco California United States of America United States represented by IPLA United States The Respondent is Wan Tu of Jian

designates numerous countries including the Republic of Korea According to the Complaint the Complainant also owns over 640 domain names incorporating the Trade Mark including osram.com and osram.kr which were registered on March 25 1999 and May 1

to the VIRGIN MONEY trademark Apple Inc v Contact Privacy Inc / Grand Slam Co WIPO Case No D2012-0844 finding �wwwipodlounge.com � to be confusingly similar to the IPOD mark The Panel finds that the Complainant has satisfied the first element

platform as well as on Apple Inc �s App Store Google Inc �s Google Play Store and Amazon.com Inc �s App store Mr Cawthon is the owner of the �FNAF World � game title and the �Five Nights at Freddy �s � abbreviation �FNAF � as well as of the

by the following the incontrovertible facts i the SEMPRA Marks � registrations are evidence of Complainant �s exclusive right to use the SEMPRA Marks ii Respondent has registered the identical and therefore confusingly similar Disputed

See Vertical Solutions Mgmt Inc v webnet-marketing inc FA 95095 Forum July 31 2000 holding that the respondent s failure to respond allows all reasonable inferences of fact in the allegations of the complaint to be deemed true see also Talk City

Corp v Domains by Proxy Inc / Joseph Gross WIPO Case No D2010-0842 The threshold for satisfying this first element is low and generally panels have found that fully incorporating the identical mark in a disputed domain name is sufficient to

Protected WhoisGuard Inc / Giacinto Napolitani Case No D2017-2064 1 The Parties Complainant is Supercell Oy of Helsinki Finland represented by Roschier Brands Attorneys Ltd Finland Respondent is WhoisGuard Protected WhoisGuard Inc of

use See in this regard Apple Computer Inc v PrivacyProtect.org / Private Registrations Aktien Gesellschaft WIPO Case No D2012-0879 in which the panel found that the website connected with applestor.com is an example of a phishing website and

WIPO Verfahren Nr D2016-0112 Apple Inc v Protection Domain WIPO Verfahren Nr D2014-0187 Raiffeisen Schweiz Genossenschaft v Wildvest LLC WIPO Verfahren Nr DCH2008-0004 MasterCard International Incorporated v DL Webb WIPO-Verfahren Nr D2008-0324 F

FA1310001526245 LD Products Inc v Whois Agent / Whois Privacy Protection Service Inc FA1311001528680 Baylor University v Domain Administrator c/o Fundacion Private Whois FA1401001541455 Black Hills Ammunition Inc v ICS INC FA1401001541563 Target

y Derivados S.A de C.V v Apple Inc Case No D2017-1351 1 The Parties The Complainant is Comercializadora de Lacteos y Derivados S.A de C.V of Durango Mexico represented by Jalife Caballero & Asociados Mexico The Respondent is Apple Inc of

a number of other marks that include the ETS phrase for various products and services related to testing The Complainant owns multiple registrations for domain names that incorporate the EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICES Mark and the ETS Mark

the Year � im Jahr 2011 von Apple Inc Gegenwärtig befindet sich die App des Beschwerdeführers unter iTunes � top 10 der freien Applikationen und ist in über 25 Sprachen verfügbar einschließlich der deutschen Sprache Der Beschwerdeführer ist

bulbs of various types While Apple may have a trademark for Apple for computers it has no rights to stop others from using apple or apple.com to sell apples Accordingly Complainant will have shown that Respondent had no right to register the

of such secondary meaning includes length and amount of sales under the trademark the nature and extent of advertising consumer surveys and media recognition See for example Uitgeverij Crux v W Frederic Isler WIPO Case No D2000-0575 Further it

to the said trademark See Apple Inc v Contact Privacy Inc / Grand Slam Co WIPO Case No D2012-0844 citing WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions 2nd Ed WIPO Overview 2.0 which is now superseded by WIPO Over 3.0 that

classes Klein means dwarf Can Apple Inc prevent all uses of apple 6 Calvinklein.我爱你 means I love Calvin Klein What is the reason for this infringing If this is the case I love god and I love you should also be prohibited 7 The Complainant